Institute of FAME, Inc.

Research · Issue area · FinTech Consumer Protection

FinTech Consumer Protection

Buy-now-pay-later, alternative credit data, and FinTech-driven small-business credit have produced uneven outcomes for under-resourced households and SMEs. Which products genuinely expand access — and which extract from the populations they serve?

Behavioral and structural evidence on FinTech adoption among under-resourced consumers and small enterprises — informing consumer-protection regulation, financial-inclusion policy, and SME-credit programs.

About this issue area

Buy-now-pay-later platforms targeted at low-income consumers grew approximately five-fold between 2019 and 2024, with consumer-protection enforcement lagging the product proliferation. Alternative credit-data products have produced uneven outcomes for under-resourced households. FinTech adoption in small and mid-sized enterprises shows significant cross-sector and cross-country variation that has implications for credit-supply policy and for financial inclusion more broadly.

The Institute of FAME's research base in this area centers on Rehman et al. (2023, Economies), which examines FinTech adoption and bank credit supplies in manufacturing SMEs — establishing the firm-level adoption-determinants framework the institute extends in subsequent research. A companion paper currently under review at Sustainability examines FinTech and gender disparities in EU sustainable-investment intentions, with direct implications for the gender-and-financial-inclusion agenda.

The issue area's research questions span: which FinTech products genuinely expand access for under-resourced consumers and which extract from them; which institutional and behavioral conditions predict productive FinTech adoption in SMEs; how alternative credit-data products affect access and outcomes for borrowers traditionally underserved by mainstream credit; and how consumer-protection regulation should evolve in response to FinTech product innovation.

Plain-language explainer

What this means for you

A parent takes out a Buy-Now-Pay-Later loan for back-to-school clothes. The platform shows four equal monthly payments, no interest, no credit check. What the platform doesn't show as prominently: the late fee that triggers if any payment misses by a single day; the collections agency that owns the receivable within sixty days of the second miss; the impact on the parent's credit score from a data-furnishing arrangement disclosed in fine print. The clothes cost $180. The eventual cost is $540.

That pattern — financial products engineered to exploit predictable behavioral vulnerabilities in under-resourced consumers — is not accidental. BNPL platforms targeted at low-income consumers grew approximately five-fold between 2019 and 2024. Alternative credit-data products have produced uneven outcomes for households traditionally underserved by mainstream credit. Algorithmic mortgage-pricing systems produce racially disparate outcomes "without intent." The behavioral economics behind each product is well-understood — by the engineers who designed them.

The Institute of FAME funds research that examines which FinTech products genuinely expand access for under-resourced consumers and which extract from them. Our research base in this area centers on a 2023 study in Economies examining FinTech adoption and bank credit supplies in manufacturing SMEs — establishing the firm-level adoption-determinants framework subsequent research extends. A companion paper currently under review examines FinTech and gender disparities in EU sustainable-investment intentions, with direct implications for the gender-and-financial-inclusion agenda.

The protagonists in this work are not abstract. They're the parents managing BNPL receivables, the small-business owners whose merchant-services contracts auto-renewed at 35% above the original rates, the retirees who learned about hidden surrender penalties only after they were locked into 12-year annuity contracts. They are also the CFPB analysts and state attorneys general trying to write enforceable rules against the deceptive marketing, and the consumer-financial-protection advocates trying to translate behavioral-economics findings into operative regulation.

Your support funds the peer-reviewed research that becomes the evidence regulators cite when industry argues "consumers chose freely." Generational wealth is stripped one financial decision at a time. The research is how we prove what's happening. The policy translation is how we stop it.

Evidence base

FAME-funded and affiliated research in this area

Peer-reviewed publications that anchor FAME's standing in this issue area.

FinTech Adoption in SMEs and Bank Credit Supplies: A Study on Manufacturing SMEs

2023

Rehman SU, Al-Shaikh MS, Washington PB, Lee E, Song Z, Abu-AlSondos IA, Shehadeh M, Allahham M

Economies, 11(8), 213

Funded by Institute of FAME56 citationsdoi:10.3390/economies11080213PDF

Where FAME stands

Institutional positions on questions in this area

Question

What policy interventions productively expand FinTech adoption in small and mid-sized manufacturing enterprises?

FinTech adoption in manufacturing SMEs is shaped substantially by firm-level factors (institutional readiness, prior digital-financial-service engagement, bank-relationship structure) that are responsive to targeted policy intervention. Generic FinTech-promotion programs without firm-level support produce uneven adoption that excludes precisely the sub-categories of SMEs (smaller firms, less-well-banked sectors, female-founded SMEs) whose access expansion would deliver the strongest financial-inclusion gains. The institute supports targeted SME-credit and FinTech-adoption programs that incorporate firm-level capability-building, distinguished from broad-stroke FinTech-promotion frameworks.

Adopted 2026-05-08

See the full Positions surface for the institute's positions across all issue areas.

Forthcoming outputs

  • Policy brief on FinTech adoption determinants in small and mid-sized enterprises
  • Policy brief on BNPL consumer-protection priorities for under-resourced households
  • Small invitation-only convening on FinTech consumer-protection priorities (Year 1)
  • Regulatory comments on CFPB BNPL- and credit-data-related rulemakings

Policy actors we engage in this area

  • CFPB Bureau of Consumer Protection
  • FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection
  • State Attorneys General consumer-protection units
  • National Consumer Law Center
  • Aspen Institute Financial Security Program
  • Pew Charitable Trusts Consumer Finance team