Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling on Tweets about Online Education during COVID-19
2021Mujahid M, Lee E, Rustam F, Washington PB, Ullah S, Reshi AA, Ashraf I
Applied Sciences, 11(18), 8438
Research · Issue area · Financial Education Measurement
Behavioral Measurement in Personal-Finance Education
Personal-finance curricula reach 30 million U.S. K-12 students annually on largely-untested behavioral assumptions. What measurement-grade evidence shows which interventions actually predict adult financial outcomes?
Rigorous psychometric measurement and outcome-grounded research for the financial-literacy curricula that personal-finance education depends on.
About this issue area
Twenty-seven U.S. states now mandate personal-finance graduation requirements, and federal-level financial-education programming reaches an even larger audience through CFPB and state-DOE-coordinated curricula. The policy-mandate momentum has materially outpaced the research base on whether curriculum-level interventions actually predict adult financial outcomes — savings rates, credit-management capability, retirement-readiness, financial-stress resilience.
The Institute of FAME funds research that closes that measurement-evidence gap. The institute's flagship behavioral-measurement program — the Maturity Type Indicator (MTI) — is one of the few institutionally-owned, bond-anchored behavioral instruments built specifically for financial-decision-making contexts: rigorous measurement designed to be shared with the field, not locked inside any single product.
The issue area's research questions span: which behavioral patterns at the student level predict adult financial outcomes; which curriculum interventions move those patterns and which do not; how measurement instruments themselves can be evaluated for predictive validity in the populations they are deployed against; and how measurement evidence should shape state and federal financial-education policy.
Plain-language explainer
What this means for you
Picture the 7th-grader sitting in a personal-finance class. The curriculum was probably written ten years ago. The 401(k) plan she'll face when she's 22 didn't exist when the curriculum was written. The Buy-Now-Pay-Later platform she'll encounter at 19 didn't exist either. The behavioral-economics findings about how teenagers actually make financial decisions — written by researchers at Stanford and Yale and elsewhere — mostly never made it into her textbook.
Twenty-seven states have made personal-finance a graduation requirement. That's a meaningful policy commitment: thirty million students sit in those classes every year. But the curricula reaching them are largely untested in the populations they're taught to. We don't actually know which classroom interventions predict adult savings rates, credit-management capability, or retirement readiness. We don't know whether the assumptions baked into the materials hold up against the financial products today's teenagers will actually face when they age out of the classroom.
That measurement gap isn't accidental. Designing rigorous measurement tools for financial-decision-making in real-world populations is slow, expensive, un-glamorous work. The behavioral-finance research that does it well mostly lives in academic journals that K-12 curriculum publishers don't read. The behavioral-finance research that gets cited in marketing materials for those curricula is often whatever was available when the materials were written — sometimes from convenience samples that look nothing like the populations the curriculum is now deployed against.
The Institute of FAME funds the slower research. Our flagship instrument — the Maturity Type Indicator — is one of the few institutionally-owned behavioral measurement tools built specifically for financial decisions, designed to be shared with the state Departments of Education, educator-research partnerships, and consumer-research teams that need it. Your support funds that measurement work and the policy translation that puts measurement-grade evidence in front of the people writing the next generation of personal-finance curricula.
Evidence base
FAME-funded and affiliated research in this area
Peer-reviewed publications that anchor FAME's standing in this issue area.
Integrating Learning Analytics and Collaborative Learning for Improving Student's Academic Performance
2021Rafique I, Lee E, Washington PB, Mkaouer MW, Aljedaani W, Ashraf I
IEEE Access, 9, 167812–167826
Active programs
FAME programs producing evidence in this area
Forthcoming outputs
- — MTI measurement paper (target: Journal of Behavioral Finance)
- — Policy brief on the measurement-evaluation gap in financial-literacy curricula
- — Shared MTI access for qualifying state-DOE and educator-research partnerships
Policy actors we engage in this area
- CFPB Office of Financial Education
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement
- State Departments of Education with personal-finance graduation requirements
- FINRA Investor Education Foundation
- Council for Economic Education curriculum partners